|
Home >> Science >> Social Sciences >> Linguistics >> Languages >> Natural >> Sino-Tibetan >> Tibetan |
|
|
Sino-Tibetan languages form the language family of about 250 languages of East Asia, second single to Indo-European in terms of the number of speakers. Several of the languages come tonal, which however is unremarkably considered to become an areal feature rather than evidence of the genealogic relationship. Chinese and Tibetan, for example, were non tonal in their sooner stages. When another example, a few word pairs that potty exclusively exist as distinguished by tone around mainstream Mandarwithin keep close at hand different vowels or even consonants in a few of the Mandarin "dialects", suggesting that tone is required, or even at least its role is reinforced, because words that may develop been pronounced otherwise inside the parent language currently take tone to differentiate. Two or three scholars like Christopher We. Beckwith, Roy The. Miller, & W. S. Coblin wonder whether a Sinitic languages come related to Tibeto-Burman. Still, similar arguments may be bring completely branches of the personal. There is no regular healthy laws on a Sino-Tibetan (or even Tibeto-Burman) languages keep around been uncovered. So, although a Sino-Tibetan hypothesis enjoys far flung trend lines, these are non likewise demonstrated when a Indo-European personal. More linguists, especially in China, think a Tai-Kadai and Hmong-Mien languages belong in Sino-Tibetan, though this learn from has fallen away from favor in a West, sustaining the similarities existence credited to borrowings & areal features. James Matisoff's widely accepted classification is as follows:
Sino-Tibetan (Matisoff)
It can be that Chinese owes its traditional priviledged place therein classification to ethnical like than linguitic criteria, very much like Semitic was once considered the primary branch of the "Hamito-Semitic" family; and even as Semitic was late demoted to the sub-branch of Afro-Asiatic, several recent classifications keep around demoted Chinese to the sub-branch of Tibeto-Burman. A resulting classification by George van Driem is one. A essential a portion of this is known as a Sino-Bodic hypothesis, for it proposes that a nearest relatives of Chinese come a Bodic languages like Tibetan.
Tibeto-Burman (van Driem)
A relationships of the "Kuki-Naga" languages (Kuki, Mizo, Manipuri, etc.), both amongst every more & to a more Tibeto-Burman languages, remain unreadable, and so the van Driem classification doesn't trend lines Matisoff's Kamarupan hypothesis above.
Roger Blench comments that
A Kusunda language of western Nepal is typically thought to the remnant of the pre-Tibeto-Burman forearm languages of the southern Himalayas. Kusunda is thought to become on the verge of extinction, in case does'nt out.
| |
|
Nitartha International Nitartha International, a home for digital Tibetan, is dedicated to preserving the ancient wisdom of the arts and sciences of Tibet with modern computer technologies. Tibetan Dialects Project Synchronic and diachronic descriptions of Tibetan dialects Comparative studies of Tibetan dialects, language change in Tibetan: from preclassical Tibetan to the modern spoken dialects, classification of Tibetan dialects Tibetan Software Archive Links for various software solutions connected with the study of Tibetan. Tibet O.R.G. Tibetan language links. Learn Tibetan An online course covering the basics of Tibetan, with emphasis on the alphabet. Classical Tibetan Language Advertisement for a book by Stephan Beyer. Published by SUNY. |
|
© 2005 GeneralAnswers.org